broad coalition of New York City councilmembers, firefighters, housing
advocates and building trades members rallied on the steps of City Hall
this past Wednesday. They were there to urge passage of a new Local Law
that would install the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) 5000
Building Construction and Safety Code as the new – and more stringent -
building code for the City. This goes against the desires of the
Bloomberg Administration, which wants the less-strict International
Building Codes (IBC) implemented.
As the bill’s prime sponsor, Council Member Robert
Jackson, explained, the City is in the process of selecting a building
code that will determine the level of safety that all of New York’s
buildings must meet.
This
is an extremely important decision that cannot be taken lightly, because
for firefighters and other first responders especially, the right safety
code can literally mean the difference between life and death. "We ask
firefighters to rush into buildings during emergency situations, but the
right code could help prevent emergencies from occurring in the first
place," stated Jackson. "We owe it to them and to the people of New York
to choose a model that will provide the highest level of safety for
everyone. We cannot select a code just because it's cheapest for
builders. Cheap is not necessarily safe."
Jackson further explained that the NFPA is a
non-profit organization that has developed construction safety codes for
many decades, codes that successfully blend a safety-first focus with
the need to maintain reasonable building costs. NFPA develops its codes
through an open process that allows input from all interested parties
during the development stage. All concerned stakeholders – tenants,
firefighters, union building trades workers and everyone else involved
in the building industry who wishes to take part - come together and
thrash out the decisions until they arrive at a consensus about what is
the best for the entire group.
[columns/ad_middle.htm]
Also
addressing the issue was Gloria Waldron, who hails from Trinidad and is
now the President of New York ACORN, a membership organization of over
25,000 low and moderate income New Yorkers. "We are here as tenants and
homeowners who are threatened with the possibility of having the
buildings that we live in made legally unsafe and hazardous to our
family's health," she stated.
Waldron went on to say that ACORN believes that the
decision as to what building code is selected "should not be based on
what code is most convenient for builders or architects. Our model code
should be the one that offers the people of the City the greatest degree
of safety and the best opportunity to be heard when the code is being
created." That, Waldron declared, is why ACORN supports the adoption of
NFPA 5000 model building code. "With it, our neighborhoods will be safer
places tomorrow and 15 to 20 years from now."
Among the other supporters of the NFPA codes are the
Uniformed Firefighters Association, Local 94; the Uniformed Fire
Officers Association, Local 854; the American Healthcare Association;
and the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 3. As
Jimmy Hart, representative of the Plumbers and Pipefitters Union,
stated:
"The health, safety, and welfare of the children,
seniors, and working families of New York City is of the utmost
importance. That is why the Plumbers, Local 1, and the Enterprise
Association of Steamfitters, Local 638, and its 13,000 members are
enthusiastically supportive of the superior consensus process that is
the trademark of the NFPA 5000." And referring to the building code that
the Bloomberg Administration is pushing, Hart said, "Time and time
again, the IBC has proven they cannot live up to the same standards."
Implementation of the NFPA codes is already supported
by a majority of City’s 51 councilmembers. Among the bill’s co-sponsors
are Charles Barron, Tracy Boyland, Leroy Comrie, Lewis Fidler, Helen
Foster, James Gennaro, Vincent Gentile, Letitia James, John Liu, Miguel
Martinez, Annabel Palma, Bill Perkins, Kendall Stewart and Al Vann.
Councilmembers are calling on the Administration to
allow fair hearings to weigh the pros and cons of the competing
legislation. At this time of heightened sensitivity surrounding building
safety, that is certainly a reasonable request.