Immigration Committee Scrutinizes ACS
Treatment of Youth Eligible for Immigrant Status Adjustment
arlier
this month, the City Council Committee on Immigration, chaired
by Council Member Kendall Stewart, conducted an oversight
hearing to discuss strategies to protect children in New York
City’s foster care system who qualify for Special Immigrant
Juvenile Status (SIJS).
As
Stewart explained, SIJS is a federal law that allows certain
documented and undocumented children in long-term foster care
due to abuse, neglect, abandonment or guardianship to obtain
lawful immigration status. For this to occur, it is crucial
that they be identified and the proper legal steps taken in a
timely manner. In New York State, when a youth reaches 18, they
"age out" of the child welfare system. If an adjustment in their
immigration status has not been completed by then, they miss out
on the greatest and sometimes only chance they will ever have to
obtain lawful status. They will henceforth be ineligible for
services such as school financial aid, Medicaid and Section 8
housing. They will also be unable to obtain a social security
number or gain lawful employment, and, of course, they will live
with the constant threat of being deported to a country they no
longer know.
It is the responsibility of the Administration for Children’s
Services (ACS) to ensure that all youth in foster care who are
eligible for this status adjustment receive legal assistance in
attaining it. However, children’s advocates are gravely
concerned because all too many youth are falling through the
cracks, with disastrous results.
First
to give testimony were Ronald Richter, Deputy Commissioner of
Family Court Legal Services at ACS and Mark Lewis, ACS’s
Director of Immigration Services. They briefed the committee on
their agency’s work with undocumented immigrant children in
foster care and ACS’s efforts to facilitate their applications
for SIJS.
What emerged from their testimony, Stewart’s rigorous
questioning, and the testimony of others who followed was that
while ACS has made admirable strides in recent years in
addressing the special needs of immigrant youth, much work
remains to be done in this area, particularly given the serious,
life-long consequences of failing to help an immigrant child
acquire legal residency.
Several
youth advocates cited specific instances where ACS dropped the
ball. For example, Ghita Schwarz, an attorney with the
multi-service youth development organization The Door, told of a
sixteen-year-old who fled sexual abuse in her parents' home to
live with her aunt. Her aunt called in a report to the child
abuse hotline, and ACS initiated an investigation. Meanwhile,
ACS recommended that the aunt seek custody. The girl's parents
didn’t appear in court, and the aunt was granted custody.
Subsequently, the parents moved and refused to provide the
aunt or their daughter with contact information, much less
financial support. ACS failed to follow up on the sexual abuse
investigation, and the case was closed without ACS ever
informing the aunt or the young woman that this set of
circumstances clearly rendered her abused, neglected and
abandoned, dependent on family court, and therefore eligible for
SIJS. The young lady is an honor roll student and eager to go to
college. If she hadn’t found assistance on her own, she would
have little chance of ever legalizing her status.
Carmen
Recalde, a staff attorney at Covenant House, said that she’s
noticed that even if an ACS worker decides to investigate a case
where the youth is close to turning 18, they procrastinate.
"I’ve had to call the ACS caseworker numerous times to make sure
that they were processing the case, thereby, allowing the child
placement before their 18th birthday," Recalde
stated. "It’s important that caseworkers understand the urgency
in processing these cases and, in good faith, try to help
undocumented youth."
Hannah
Kim, an attorney with the Legal Aid Society's Juvenile Rights
Division, pointed out that although ACS’s own regulations
require it to document the immigration status of every child in
its care, at no point does ACS or foster care agencies under
contract with it formally screen for immigration status. ACS and
agencies working with it also regularly fail to obtain primary
documents such as a birth certificate and passport, which
immigration requires in order to process any application for
permanent residence, despite the agencies’ own regulations
requiring them to do so.
Along
with much criticism of ACS procedures, many practical
suggestions were given as to how the agency could identify SIJS-eligible
youth at multiple points of contact, especially at the earliest
possible stages of investigation. Lynn Neugebauer, Director of
the Safe Horizon Immigration Law Project, recommended that ACS
provide additional training on SIJS to all foster care agencies
with whom it contracts
since the foster care manager is the front line person who often
could most easily identify an undocumented child. Myra Elgabry,
an attorney with Lawyers for Children, proposed a very simple
solution to the problem of how caseworkers untrained in
immigration law can identify undocumented children: ACS should
create a field in each child's case file which includes either
"Country of Birth" or, "US-born/Foreign-born" categories, and
make that field available to law guardians.
Ragini
Shah, a clinical staff attorney and lecturer in law at the Child
Advocacy and Immigration Clinic at Columbia Law School,
suggested that New York City model ACS on the Department of
Children and Family Services in Los Angeles and Chicago because
systematically and efficiently, they each manage to identify
SIJS eligible children and submit lawful permanent resident
applications to the immigration service.
Finally,
Dr. Ilze Earner, Director of Hunter College’s Immigrants and
Child Welfare Project, submitted many excellent recommendation.
They included 1) train all juvenile and family court judges on
immigration status and SIJS so they understand the importance of
immigration relief in permanency planning, and 2) ACS establish
Memorandums of Understanding with foreign consulates to
facilitate the process for obtaining foreign documents such as
birth certificates, baptismal records, and other proof of
identity.
Committee Chair Kendall Stewart concluded the hearing by
stating his determination to pursue this extremely important
issue, and he asked Dr. Earner to assist the City Council in
drafting legislation regarding it.