Fortunately the City Council is taking what happened very seriously,
as could be seen at a press conference and the City Council meeting of
May 28th.
Before the meeting, Council Members Philip Reed and Peter Vallone Jr.
held a press conference on the steps of City Hall to announce a hearing
on June 12th at 10:00 AM to scrutinize the entire policy and
procedures of police raids. "We want to assure the public that there is
judicial review over the issuance of warrants," stated Vallone, who is
Chair of the Public Safety Committee. "We also want to look into what
went wrong with that process to ensure that these mistakes never happen
again."
Council Member Reed spoke of how harrowing what happened to Ms.
Spruill would be to any person. "Officers break down a door to a
residence, storm in with their guns, and it turns out to be a completely
innocent person, minding his or her own business," Reed said. "It is
difficult to imagine how traumatic that must be. This shocked the entire
city, not just the African American community."
Deputy
Majority Leader Bill Perkins then told of his own personal experience
with a faulty warrant: "At 5:30 one morning I get a knock on the door.
My son-in-law comes and tells me some officers are at the door with a
warrant. I go to the door and it turns out it is for someone who lives
in apt 15D - but they have the entirely wrong address! It was another
person altogether. Thank God I opened the door myself," he continued,
"because I don't know what would have happened if my son-in-law had done
so and been identified as the person they were looking for. It's very
good that this council is taking some leadership with regard to
unraveling the mystery and tragedy of these warrants."
Council Members Charles Barron, James Davis, Kendall Stewart, Tracy
Boyland, Larry Seabrook, Miguel Martinez and Robert Jackson also took
part in the press conference. Stated Jackson, "We must find out the
process with these 'no-knock' warrants and fix it so that we never ever
see someone frightened to death again." Martinez added, "We have seen in
our communities over and over again the police make a mistake and then
they just apologize." Speaking first in English and then in Spanish he
declared, "We don't want apologies! We want to make sure that before
they enter the homes of our residents they have accurate information."
The discussion of Ms. Spruill's wrongful death (the coroner called it
murder) continued in full force during the City Council meeting. Stated
Council Member Barron, "I think we need to move beyond looking into
procedural changes on "no-knock" warrants. The City Medical Examiner
said that her death was directly linked to her heart attack. Someone
needs to be arrested and prosecuted. A crime was committed."
He spoke, too, of the fact that some people prefer to call it an
"accident" rather than murder. "They don't have "accidents" like this in
other communities," he commented. "These "accidents" always seem to
happen in our communities. Well, our communities are fed up with it and
so am I. Someone should be held accountable and pay dearly for the death
of Ms. Spruill."
As Council Member James Davis, a former police officer and Police
Academy instructor, spoke, it was clear just how criminally negligent
the entire maneuver at Alberta Spruill's apartment had been. "When I
worked on the warrant squad, at 4 and 5 in the morning we would go and
get so-called 'bad' individuals," he explained. "But there were checks
and balances - at least 5 steps of verification before you rushed in. We
never just took the word of an unreliable informant right off the bat.
You're supposed to do some type of quality investigation - talk to the
neighbors, to the owner of the building, etc. What these cops did in
this particular case was outrageous and it saddens my heart."
Three pieces of legislation regarding this issue were introduced by
Council Member Larry Seabrook. One resolution calls on the Manhattan
District Attorney, the New York State Attorney General and the United
States Department of Justice to launch a full-scale independent
investigation into the New York Police Department's use of diversionary
devices such as stun grenades, including whether there are
discriminatory practices in their use. It also asks for a review of
whether the procedure for "no-knock" search warrants is a civil rights
violation.