he subject of
reparations to descendants of enslaved Africans in America is definitely
gaining momentum--as can be seen by events throughout the New York area
on merely one day last week.
On Tuesday morning, March 26th, in a Federal Court in
Brooklyn, Deadria Farmer-Paellman filed the first class-action lawsuit
seeking compensation from United States companies for profiting from the
"slave" trade.
The suit, which was filed in behalf of all living
descendants of enslaved Africans in this country, seeks unspecified
damages from Aetna Inc., the FleetBoston Financial Corporation, and the
CSX Corporation because they or their parent companies profited from
enslaved labor.
The suit charges that the three defendants "knowingly
benefited from a system that enslaved, tortured, starved, and exploited
human beings." Specifically, it states that FleetBoston evolved from an
earlier bank founded by a John Brown of Providence, Rhode Island who
owned ships used to transport captured Africans; that Aetna's
predecessor "insured slave owners against the loss of their human
chattel;" and that CSX is the descendant of railroad lines that were
constructed or run, in part, by enslaved labor.
Roger S. Wareham, one of the plaintiffs' attorneys,
said that whatever money is won in the lawsuit will not go to
individuals, but rather into a fund to improve health, education and
housing for all African Americans.
NYU SCHOOL OF LAW HOLDS REPARATIONS SYMPOSIUM
That
same day the New York University School of Law, in conjunction with the
New York University Black Allied Law Students Association (BALSA),
hosted an all-day symposium entitled, A DREAM DEFERRED: Comparative
and Practical Considerations for the Black Reparations Movement.
Attended by law students and many others from the
university and community, the purpose of this Twelfth Annual BALSA
Symposium was to provide a forum to discuss theories of unjust
enrichment and retributive justice; various successful national and
international reparations movements by other ethnic groups; and forms of
legal redress, including litigation and legislation, available (or not)
to the Black reparations movement in America.
The symposium was moderated by Professor F.Michael
Higginbotham, the author of Race Law: Cases, Commentary, and
Questions, and Professor of Law at the University of Baltimore where
he teaches Constitutional Law, International Law, and Race and the Law.
HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE AND COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS
The morning session was entitled "Reparations
Movements: Historical Roots and Comparative Analysis." First to speak
was Professor Anthony J. Sebok, teacher of Tort Theory and Jurisprudence
at Brooklyn Law School. Having dealt with Holocaust slave labor
litigation based on unjust enrichment arguments, he spoke on the
limitations encountered when trying to build a reparations case on that
basis.
He was followed by Professor Bonnie B.C Oh, Research
Professor of Korean Studies at the Edmund A. Walsh School of Foreign
Service at Georgetown University. Her field of expertise was litigation
on behalf of the Korean "Comfort Women" who were forced to provide
sexual services to the Japanese servicemen during World War II. She
discussed various avenues that are being pursued to obtain justice for
them from the Japanese Government.
Next to speak was Attorney Morris A. Ratner, a
partner at Leiff, Cabraser, Heimann & Bernstein, LLP, a firm
specializing in class actions and other complex litigation on behalf of
victims of human rights, environmental contamination, discrimination,
and other categories of misconduct. Ratner, who led the firm's efforts
on German Holocaust-era litigations, reviewed what had and had not
worked there as it related to effort to obtain reparations for African
Americans.
The final speaker of the morning was Professor Alfred
A. Brophy who teaches administrative law and American legal history at
the University of Alabama School of Law. He writes, too, about race and
law in American history. His most recent work is Reconstructing the
Dreamland: The Tulsa Riot of 1921--Race, Reparations, Reconciliation.
His presentation dealt with the ongoing efforts to obtain reparations
for the Tulsa Race Riot.
WHERE DO WE GO FROM HERE?
Following the lunch break, the afternoon session was
entitled,
"Where Do
We Go from Here?: The Legal Case for Black Reparations in America." The
first speaker was the highly esteemed Adjoa A. Aiyetoro, social justice
activist and chief legal consultant to the National Coalition of Blacks
for Reparations in America (N'COBRA). She is an adjunct professor at
Washington College of Law, American University where she teaches a
course on Litigating Reparations for African Americans.
Within her very rich presentation Aiyetoro spoke
about the fact that every successful reparations strategy has combined
direct action, a campaign of public education about the issue,
legislative action, and litigation. "Any of these by themselves won't
succeed," explained Aiyetoro. "We need to use all these tools to put the
pressure on."
Next up
was Ajamu K. Sankofa, Director of New York City Police Watch, a project
of the Ella Baker Center for Human Rights. He co-chairs the criminal
punishment sub-committee of N'COBRA's Litigation Team which is planning
to file a Reparations lawsuit. His message focused on the practical
considerations of achieving reparations, including, centrally, the
reclamation of the African mind. "The process of mind reclamation is a
prerequisite for the taking back of what was taken from us," stated
Sankofa.
ON
TO NEW JERSEY WITH THE HOUSE OF THE LORD CHURCH
From there, the action moved on to New Jersey, where
the Brooklyn House of the Lord Church's Expansion Ministry hosted a
reparations meeting titled "Tap the Power Within" at the Miller Branch
Library on Bergen Avenue in Jersey City.
A
cross-section of the community was present to hear the two main speakers
of the evening, Pamela Payne, the church's Chairperson for the Committee
on Reparations, and Onaje Muid, the International Commissioner for
N'COBRA.
Ms. Payne laid out an overview of the reparations
struggle, including why they are owed, some of the organizations working
for them and approaches being taken to get them, as well as what forms
reparations might take.
And the audience was stirred as Onaje Muid spoke from
his heart about how necessary it is for individuals to take part in the
struggle for reparations in order to reclaim themselves, their
self-identity, and self-determination as a people.
All in all, it was a great day and evening, and it
bodes well for the growing reparations movement.