s New York
City continues to thrash out its budgetary issues, one of the most hotly
contested items on the Mayor's cutting block is the firehouse closings.
City
Council Member Yvette Clarke, Chair of the Fire and Criminal Justice
Services Committee, issued a strong statement in which she said in part:
"I refuse to accept that closing any firehouse in this city is mandatory
to meeting our budget needs. With all this fiscal expertise at our
disposal, it seems inconceivable that, as legislators, we cannot find
alternative means of meeting our budget demands without imperiling one
life in this city."
And she points out, "Ultimately, the issue comes down to this: we can
save money by closing firehouses. But we would only be saving that money
to settle the lawsuits brought by the victims and families of victims
who needlessly either died or were injured in communities where
firehouses had previously existed. To close a firehouse today is to
reserve a burial plot for someone tomorrow. And that's a not reality
that I or anyone else in this debate should be willing to accept."
The
issue becomes even more troubling when we examine the location of the
proposed firehouse closings. Council Member Diana Reyna, whose district
takes in Williamsburg and Bushwick, Brooklyn, stated, "I am concerned
that five of the eight firehouses proposed to be closed are in Brooklyn,
and that three of the eight are in North Brooklyn. In addition, a
firehouse in Bushwick is scheduled to close for renovations at the same
time, making four closures in North Brooklyn." And referring to the fact
that throughout the 1970s and 80s, this area experienced many arson
fires, she added, "I do not understand why an area that historically has
been ravaged by fires would have such a disproportionate reduction in
fire services."
As her Chief of Staff, Karl Camillucci, explained further, North
Brooklyn is just beginning to rebound from these previous fires.
"Thousands of units of low-cost housing have been built where all the
empty lots once were," he said. "People are finally starting to move
back into the community, and it's safer than it's ever been. Residents
are just beginning to see things turn up, and it would be a real shame
if this changed that. No one is saying that closing these firehouses
would automatically lead to another decline," Camillucci continued, "but
knowing that fire is what led to the devastation in the first place, why
would you want to reduce services just when things are starting to look
better?"
Brooklyn
Councilman Erik Dilan feels the same way. "I strongly disagree with the
Mayor's proposal to close the firehouse in Bushwick," he stated. "Now
that new housing is being built and the area is in much better shape
financially, to totally ignore the lessons history has taught us would
be a great mistake. However," he continued, "I remain hopeful that the
Blue-ribbon Commission will hold true to what it was intended to do, and
we'll certainly seek to make sure they carry out their responsibilities.
I'm waiting to see who will be appointed to this Commission on the
Council side."
[columns/ad_middle.htm]
Many
community activists are waiting to see who will be appointed, too.
Melvin Foster, Chairman of the Neighborhood Stabilization Task Force in
Bedford Stuyvesant, believes very strongly that, "A Blue-ribbon
Commission has to include some of the neighborhood groups so that they
can also give their input." He said as well that Northern Brooklyn's
problem with arson fires isn't merely a thing of the past; it is a very
real concern even today.
Foster pointed out, too, that each firehouse in that area is crucial
because of the way they must all work together. "Especially now that
firehouses are also responsible for doing building inspections as well
as EMS runs, they are all needed," he explained. "By protocol if
Firehous #209, for example, is on an EMS run where they're securing a
patient with a heart attack and there's a call for a fire, they're not
allowed to leave to tackle the fire that's in their area. It then falls
upon firehous #210 to take care of the fire. If #210 is somewhere else
doing a similar action, then it falls on #235." And Foster made clear
that this isn't a matter of pitting one firehouse or one community
against another; it is basically about looking at what really can be cut
without hurting communities.
Anna Gonzalez, Chairwoman of Brooklyn's Community Board 4, said that
along with worry over these other proposed closings, there is also great
concern about losing the Bushwick firehouse that the City claims is only
being closed for renovation. Reflecting the views of many people, she
commented, "Even though they say it will reopen as soon as they renovate
it, fat chance for that to ever happen." And she continued, "I am hoping
that this Blue-ribbon Commission is going to be a fairer presentation of
the people than what's been so far, because according to what we heard,
the way they decided about closing down fire stations was by putting
information into a computer, not by listening to the people. What
information went into the computer, nobody knows."
And Gonzalez said that in fairness to the community of Bushwick which
was once so devastated by fire that it looked like a war zone, now that
they're rebuilding, the residents don't want things to go back to the
way they were. "We're hoping that Council Members will push to make sure
this Commission has representation from the communities so that the
community voices will be heard," she concluded.
In order to best serve their North Brooklyn constituents, Assemblyman
Vito Lopez - who organized a big town hall meeting around this issue -
Council Members Diana Reyna, Erik Dilan, David Yassky and Bill DeBlasio
as well as Senator-elect Martin Dilan plan to continue collaborating
with each other and working closely with Councilwoman Clarke to reach a
collective solution to this problem.
Donna Lamb can be reached at
dlamb@gis.net.